Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 14:08
|
|
|
wanderful posts:
u1234 wrote: | DON'T BELIEVE IN OTHERS.
FOCUS UPON YOUR OWN SELF. |
Sorry, but I don't believe this.
^_~
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 18:05
|
|
|
Stevelord posts:
u1234 wrote: | DON'T BELIEVE IN OTHERS.
FOCUS UPON YOUR OWN SELF. |
You just startled me with your stark message from nowhere, U1234, where did you come from and why did you post that here on Master Mystery's thread. Mystery 443, do you have multiple personalities?
Steve
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:12
|
|
|
wanderful posts:
I think mystery is also this u1234, or perhaps they are similar expressions, etc.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 17:18
|
|
|
derelic7 posts:
Let's have a channeled essence battle!
u1234 wrote: | DON'T BELIEVE IN OTHERS.
FOCUS UPON YOUR OWN SELF. |
And we welcome this new essence, for regardless of its energy projections that you are meant to do or do not some particular expression, all contributions within consciousness are beneficial to the energy which within you are all interacting. I may suggest a slight recalibration of this statement.
It is, experientally speaking, impossible not to involve other essences and their attentions, for as you are aware, you are all interconnected. You reflect eachother's movement, eachother's perceptions within your interactions.
What qualities you believe other individual attentions to hold are very imaginative reflections of your own perception; your own qualities. And most importantly, how you REACT to the projections of other individuals are informative of your own perception.
An additional quality to the mechanism of perception, and it's purposeful design, is that within each encounter of another's perception, you are allowing yourself the opportunity to alter your perception quite effortlessly. You are aware of this within your expression of verbiage that you shall become who you interact with.
This is not to discount your individual perception and movement, which you tend to do, and i would view this to be rather unfortunate. However, in being accepting of your own movement you shall also allow yourself more of a statement of example, and simultaneously being flexible within your choices of perception. You shall naturally exhibit a comfort and expression in which you value the perceptions of other individuals without denying your own tremendous value. I have intentionally not labelled this as an expression of security, for this would serve only to reinforce your beliefs of separation, and the idea that there is ever a point in time in which you are genuinely insecure. Not so true as it would seem.
Be well, as always.
Michael/Sharee
Now.. Any contenders?
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 20:00
|
|
|
Stevelord posts:
At last!!. The battle of the bands!!
In one corner, the mighty, all knowing SHaree X. BUt Sharee, are you sure this guy 1234 is essence, same status as you essence , I mean. He sounds a little quirky. Are you able to tune in to this Mystery 443 to see if he is 1234 in masquerade, or what is going on with these two dudes that seem to be speaking gibberish half the time? You sure this isnt a hoax?
And while we are on the subject , do you know Paul Helfrich's wife , Joanne, who we heard channeling someone called Rose in the big Elias hootenanny in Castaic California, last April 5th and 6th. I have the feeling she is channeling her subjective, not an outside essence or her Big Daddy essence. Can you tell or would you have to hear her speak as Rose to kow for sure?
Thanks,
Steve
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 21:25
|
|
|
derelic7 posts:
Stevelord wrote: |
In one corner, the mighty, all knowing SHaree X. BUt Sharee, are you sure this guy 1234 is essence, same status as you essence , I mean. He sounds a little quirky. |
Clarification. I am my wider self, incorporating a wider recognition of energy and communication. This essence name is a translation of the tone of my movement in this physical dimension. It is presently not acceptable to refer to myself with this name.
Secondly, ALL is essence! There is no such thing as outside essence. Your own or another essence, but no outside!
Quote: | Are you able to tune in to this Mystery 443 to see if he is 1234 in masquerade, or what is going on with these two dudes that seem to be speaking gibberish half the time? You sure this isnt a hoax? |
I would not wish to reveal this and spoil your fun!
Quote: |
And while we are on the subject , do you know Paul Helfrich's wife , Joanne, who we heard channeling someone called Rose in the big Elias hootenanny in Castaic California, last April 5th and 6th. I have the feeling she is channeling her subjective, not an outside essence or her Big Daddy essence. Can you tell or would you have to hear her speak as Rose to know for sure? |
She is exchanging energy with an essence named Rose, but not the same as the Rose engaging this dimension. There is a factor of distortion, which you interpret as illegitimate, which is not true. Essences that do not reside within the Sumafi family hold little concern with distortion within belief systems. They focus upon projecting energy in aide, creativite initiation and encouragment and not devoting this energy into carefully chosen words that do not reinforce your belief systems.
How shall this be bad? You hold belief systems regardless and choose individually which essences to engage.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 21:47
|
|
|
Stevelord posts:
derelic7 wrote: | Stevelord wrote: |
In one corner, the mighty, all knowing SHaree X. BUt Sharee, are you sure this guy 1234 is essence, same status as you essence , I mean. He sounds a little quirky. |
Clarification. I am my wider self, incorporating a wider recognition of energy and communication. This essence name is a translation of the tone of my movement in this physical dimension. It is presently not acceptable to refer to myself with this name.
. |
Sharee I dont know how to translate this paragraph of yours , so you mean you want us to refer to you by another name other than Sharee?
ALso someone asked Elias the mass transportation question you commented on before, and did you see his answer, quoted again below? Do you want to clue us in on the type of technology that will be used , and the name of the companies who are now competing to make this gizmo?
Thanks,
Steve
Anon: There’s also some discussion of some kind of new transportation coming. I’m very interested in this - I’m not quite sure how to pose the question without it being so open-ended that it’s ridiculous. Is the new transportation that’s going to come, does it involve land or air? Travel on land or travel through the air?
Elias: Both.
Anon: Does that mean it’s two separate forms of transportation or one that combines them both?
Elias: There are strong (emphasized) potentials for both. For two separate modes of transportation and also one that combines them.
Anon: Is it a potential that this will have to do with mass transportation? In other words, something that will move a great deal of people together or is it an individual….
Elias: I would respond to that also, with both (E chuckles). There are significant changes occurring. They are already occurring. Therefore there is significant potential for interesting and exciting new developments.
Anon: Is it a strong potential that the genesis of this new transportation will happened in the United States? Will it be developed and designed here?
Elias: That is uncertain. For there are some being processed in your country and there some being in the process abroad, also.
Anon: Europe or the far east?
Elias: European. Therefore it is a matter of who develops first.
Anon: Is it a potential that government will be developing this or private companies?
Elias: Not the government.
Anon: Not the government…. Is the potential strong that this will happen before…. 2012, to pick a year.
Elias: It is possible.
Anon: But the potential… sounds like you’re saying, isn’t as strong?
Elias: It may be – that would be undetermined as yet, also. It is a process.
Anon: What is the potential that I will be using this form of transportation in my focus time framework?
Elias: Significant. (strongly)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 22:55
|
|
|
derelic7 posts:
Stevelord wrote: | derelic7 wrote: |
Clarification. I am my wider self, incorporating a wider recognition of energy and communication. This essence name is a translation of the tone of my movement in this physical dimension. It is presently not acceptable to refer to myself with this name.
. |
Sharee I dont know how to translate this paragraph of yours , so you mean you want us to refer to you by another name other than Sharee? |
Yes, because this implied separation between me and my essence is distressing. I am the same as my wider self, i just relax my identity and allow communication to flow through. I would appreciate if you use something like widermike or michael/sharee together.
Quote: |
ALso someone asked Elias the mass transportation question you commented on before, and did you see his answer, quoted again below? |
Yes, because i am the same as my wider self. It's an aspect that's always here, i usually just don't connect in that direction.
Quote: | Do you want to clue us in on the type of technology that will be used , and the name of the companies who are now competing to make this gizmo? |
No, partly because these are presently very flexible and indefinite probabilities, and I wouldn't wanna be responsible for making you lose money if a prediction is inaccurate. I'm very uncomfortable around predictions.
|
|
|
|
|